<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ColdFusion @ Fortune 100?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/</link>
	<description>ColdFusion, Ant, jQuery and other geeky stuff with the occasional motorcycle post.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/#comment-3823</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 01:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/#comment-3823</guid>
		<description>I do work for one of the Fortune 100 companies (I'd rather not say which one). Coldfusion is just one of the many languages used here. Our group switched to CF 7.0 and recently upgraded to 8.0. We decided against .NET since at that time we were thinking about moving back to Unix servers. Money wasn't an issue so we never really considered any of the free offerings like PHP, Python, or Ruby. So that basically left us with JSP and CF. We finally settled on CF since we were doing a lot of things with Flash and we wanted to use Flash Remoting. Since then we have started to get into Flex and are really glad that we chose CF. Overall we have had absolutely no problems with CF. It has been rock solid for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do work for one of the Fortune 100 companies (I&#8217;d rather not say which one). Coldfusion is just one of the many languages used here. Our group switched to CF 7.0 and recently upgraded to 8.0. We decided against .NET since at that time we were thinking about moving back to Unix servers. Money wasn&#8217;t an issue so we never really considered any of the free offerings like PHP, Python, or Ruby. So that basically left us with JSP and CF. We finally settled on CF since we were doing a lot of things with Flash and we wanted to use Flash Remoting. Since then we have started to get into Flex and are really glad that we chose CF. Overall we have had absolutely no problems with CF. It has been rock solid for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry.b</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/#comment-3467</link>
		<dc:creator>barry.b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/#comment-3467</guid>
		<description>another question to ask of these inside the "top 100" is "why"?

I've yet to come across a new CFcustomer. Someone that has the choice of RubyonRails or ASP.NET or whatever.

the "newist" company to CF I know bought in with CF5. Would they make the same choice today?

by rights they *should* with all the cool CF8 features, but is that a reality or are we just seeing "churning"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another question to ask of these inside the &#8220;top 100&#8243; is &#8220;why&#8221;?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve yet to come across a new CFcustomer. Someone that has the choice of RubyonRails or ASP.NET or whatever.</p>
<p>the &#8220;newist&#8221; company to CF I know bought in with CF5. Would they make the same choice today?</p>
<p>by rights they *should* with all the cool CF8 features, but is that a reality or are we just seeing &#8220;churning&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emanuel Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/#comment-3462</link>
		<dc:creator>Emanuel Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 05:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/#comment-3462</guid>
		<description>I have a friend that works for Bank of America (#9) and CF is the primary language for web and intranet there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a friend that works for Bank of America (#9) and CF is the primary language for web and intranet there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/#comment-3456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/#comment-3456</guid>
		<description>Having done consulting for them, I can attest that Kroger (#26) has about 15-20 CF developers on staff, including contractors and FTEs, and including representation on the corporate Web Architecture group.  Java is a slightly larger focus, but CF is widely utilized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having done consulting for them, I can attest that Kroger (#26) has about 15-20 CF developers on staff, including contractors and FTEs, and including representation on the corporate Web Architecture group.  Java is a slightly larger focus, but CF is widely utilized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd sharp</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/#comment-3455</link>
		<dc:creator>todd sharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/#comment-3455</guid>
		<description>forgot to subscribe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>forgot to subscribe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd sharp</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/#comment-3454</link>
		<dc:creator>todd sharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/2007/09/11/coldfusion-fortune-100/#comment-3454</guid>
		<description>#27 - yes we use it - internally.  Of course we use many, many other languages - I wouldn't call any of them 'primary' - we have a massive intranet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#27 - yes we use it - internally.  Of course we use many, many other languages - I wouldn&#8217;t call any of them &#8216;primary&#8217; - we have a massive intranet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
