<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#039;s Acid (2) Reflux&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecrumb.com/2008/01/23/microsofts-acid-2-reflux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecrumb.com/2008/01/23/microsofts-acid-2-reflux/</link>
	<description>developer &#124; thinker &#124; tinkerer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://thecrumb.com/2008/01/23/microsofts-acid-2-reflux/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/01/23/microsofts-acid-2-reflux/#comment-606</guid>
		<description>@Rob - I agree completely. &#039;Standard&#039; mode should be the default.  Any &#039;fallback&#039; mode should be optional.  If you have an old site add the tag to &#039;fix&#039; your site, if you build a standards compliant site no tag required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rob &#8211; I agree completely. &#8216;Standard&#8217; mode should be the default.  Any &#8216;fallback&#8217; mode should be optional.  If you have an old site add the tag to &#8216;fix&#8217; your site, if you build a standards compliant site no tag required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Wilkerson</title>
		<link>http://thecrumb.com/2008/01/23/microsofts-acid-2-reflux/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Wilkerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/01/23/microsofts-acid-2-reflux/#comment-605</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a lot of debate about this from a lot of the big players (Meyer, Zeldman, Resig, et al).  It requires more thought on my part, but at a glance I&#039;d have to say that I think I&#039;m okay with the mechanism, but the implementation is backwards.

I understand &quot;not breaking the web&quot;, but it should be more than that.  It should be something more along the lines of &quot;progress the web with the option to stand still&quot;.  In other words, make progression (no meta tag) the default stand and backwards compatibility the opt-in.

As I said it requires more thought (and more reading of folks who are closer to this that I am), but that&#039;s what I&#039;m thinking at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of debate about this from a lot of the big players (Meyer, Zeldman, Resig, et al).  It requires more thought on my part, but at a glance I&#8217;d have to say that I think I&#8217;m okay with the mechanism, but the implementation is backwards.</p>
<p>I understand &#8220;not breaking the web&#8221;, but it should be more than that.  It should be something more along the lines of &#8220;progress the web with the option to stand still&#8221;.  In other words, make progression (no meta tag) the default stand and backwards compatibility the opt-in.</p>
<p>As I said it requires more thought (and more reading of folks who are closer to this that I am), but that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m thinking at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

