Comments on: SVN:Externals – Setting In CFEclipse/Subclipse http://thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/ developer | thinker | tinkerer Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:30:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: SVN: Créer des liens entre les dépôts avec svn:externals » D-Sites http://thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-707 SVN: Créer des liens entre les dépôts avec svn:externals » D-Sites Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:41:51 +0000 http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-707 [...] C’est le même principe, on fixe la propriété svn:externals, comme nous le montre cet exellent article: [...] [...] C’est le même principe, on fixe la propriété svn:externals, comme nous le montre cet exellent article: [...]

]]> By: Jim http://thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-706 Jim Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:48:07 +0000 http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-706 We're still stuck on an older version here at work 1.4. I haven't kept up with release notes but I think the external properties should work in newer versions of SVN as well. We’re still stuck on an older version here at work 1.4. I haven’t kept up with release notes but I think the external properties should work in newer versions of SVN as well.

]]> By: David Henry http://thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-705 David Henry Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:31:39 +0000 http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-705 Hi Jim! What version of Eclipse, Subclipse, and SVN was this written against? Hi Jim!

What version of Eclipse, Subclipse, and SVN was this written against?

]]> By: Gerry Gurevich http://thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-704 Gerry Gurevich Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:59:47 +0000 http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-704 JIM: Used this for the first time since I left NIEHS. Thanks for the resource. Very helpful. JIM: Used this for the first time since I left NIEHS. Thanks for the resource. Very helpful.

]]> By: Jim http://thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-703 Jim Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:25:14 +0000 http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-703 Erik - great question. Unfortunately I have no good answer. I think we looked at your second option but decided to go with what we did. So far it's worked well - we don't branch much so haven't run into any issues. That doesn't mean it's the 'best' way. Just what we picked when we were getting started using SVN. Erik – great question. Unfortunately I have no good answer. I think we looked at your second option but decided to go with what we did. So far it’s worked well – we don’t branch much so haven’t run into any issues. That doesn’t mean it’s the ‘best’ way. Just what we picked when we were getting started using SVN.

]]> By: Erik http://thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-702 Erik Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:49:06 +0000 http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-702 Nice article. I have a question about your repository layout. I notice that you have the following layout: telework/core/trunk/coldfusion telework/core/trunk/oracle etc. I assume this means that you also have telework/core/branches/branchA/coldfusion telework/core/branches/branchA/oracle etc. and telework/core/tags/tag1/coldfusion telework/core/tags/tag1/oracle etc. If this is correct, what made you choose this layout over for example this one: telework/core/coldfusion/trunk telework/core/coldfusion/branches/branchA telework/core/coldfusion/tags/tag1 telework/core/oracle/trunk telework/core/oracle/branches/branchA telework/core/oracle/tags/tag1 etc. What do you see as the pros & cons of the two approaches? Nice article.

I have a question about your repository layout. I notice that you have the following layout:

telework/core/trunk/coldfusion
telework/core/trunk/oracle
etc.

I assume this means that you also have

telework/core/branches/branchA/coldfusion
telework/core/branches/branchA/oracle
etc.

and

telework/core/tags/tag1/coldfusion
telework/core/tags/tag1/oracle
etc.

If this is correct, what made you choose this layout over for example this one:

telework/core/coldfusion/trunk
telework/core/coldfusion/branches/branchA
telework/core/coldfusion/tags/tag1
telework/core/oracle/trunk
telework/core/oracle/branches/branchA
telework/core/oracle/tags/tag1
etc.

What do you see as the pros & cons of the two approaches?

]]>