<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SVN:Externals - Setting In CFEclipse/Subclipse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/</link>
	<description>ColdFusion, Ant, jQuery and other geeky stuff with the occasional motorcycle post.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-4972</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-4972</guid>
		<description>Erik - great question.  Unfortunately I have no good answer.  I think we looked at your second option but decided to go with what we did.  So far it's worked well - we don't branch much so haven't run into any issues.  That doesn't mean it's the 'best' way. Just what we picked when we were getting started using SVN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik - great question.  Unfortunately I have no good answer.  I think we looked at your second option but decided to go with what we did.  So far it&#8217;s worked well - we don&#8217;t branch much so haven&#8217;t run into any issues.  That doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s the &#8216;best&#8217; way. Just what we picked when we were getting started using SVN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-4971</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/02/22/svnexternals-setting-in-cfeclipsesubclipse/#comment-4971</guid>
		<description>Nice article.

I have a question about your repository layout. I notice that you have the following layout:

telework/core/trunk/coldfusion
telework/core/trunk/oracle
etc.

I assume this means that you also have

telework/core/branches/branchA/coldfusion
telework/core/branches/branchA/oracle
etc.

and

telework/core/tags/tag1/coldfusion
telework/core/tags/tag1/oracle
etc.

If this is correct, what made you choose this layout over for example this one:

telework/core/coldfusion/trunk
telework/core/coldfusion/branches/branchA
telework/core/coldfusion/tags/tag1
telework/core/oracle/trunk
telework/core/oracle/branches/branchA
telework/core/oracle/tags/tag1
etc.

What do you see as the pros &#38; cons of the two approaches?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.</p>
<p>I have a question about your repository layout. I notice that you have the following layout:</p>
<p>telework/core/trunk/coldfusion<br />
telework/core/trunk/oracle<br />
etc.</p>
<p>I assume this means that you also have</p>
<p>telework/core/branches/branchA/coldfusion<br />
telework/core/branches/branchA/oracle<br />
etc.</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>telework/core/tags/tag1/coldfusion<br />
telework/core/tags/tag1/oracle<br />
etc.</p>
<p>If this is correct, what made you choose this layout over for example this one:</p>
<p>telework/core/coldfusion/trunk<br />
telework/core/coldfusion/branches/branchA<br />
telework/core/coldfusion/tags/tag1<br />
telework/core/oracle/trunk<br />
telework/core/oracle/branches/branchA<br />
telework/core/oracle/tags/tag1<br />
etc.</p>
<p>What do you see as the pros &amp; cons of the two approaches?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
