<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CFML IDE - Initial Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/</link>
	<description>ColdFusion, Ant, jQuery and other geeky stuff with the occasional motorcycle post.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken McCafferty</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/#comment-5522</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/?p=420#comment-5522</guid>
		<description>I still use JRun Studio 3 because of it's support for Wizards. Wizards were one of the great features of JRun Studio and CF Studio.
They can greatly decrease development time. I think if Adobe is interested in creating a great IDE for CF, they need to include the ability to create and use Wizards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still use JRun Studio 3 because of it&#8217;s support for Wizards. Wizards were one of the great features of JRun Studio and CF Studio.<br />
They can greatly decrease development time. I think if Adobe is interested in creating a great IDE for CF, they need to include the ability to create and use Wizards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint Blogs &#187; The Week in ColdFusion: 9-15 April: Code crazy</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/#comment-5361</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint Blogs &#187; The Week in ColdFusion: 9-15 April: Code crazy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/?p=420#comment-5361</guid>
		<description>[...] of the things that makes ColdFusion great is the community. Jim Priest has posted a community-driven CFML IDE survey&#8230; where he&#8217;s making the results publicly available. Already there are over 300 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the things that makes ColdFusion great is the community. Jim Priest has posted a community-driven CFML IDE survey&#8230; where he&#8217;s making the results publicly available. Already there are over 300 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/#comment-5327</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/?p=420#comment-5327</guid>
		<description>"I don’t think Adobe will support OpenBD tags[snip]"

I can't help but imagine the following appearing everywhere...

cfif Server.IsColdFusion
... do this
cfelseif Server.IsOpenBD AND Server.Version IS NOT "9.3"
... don't do this
cfelseif Server.IsCommercialBD
... do this, but do it the BD way
cfelse
... Throw hands in air!
/cfif

Or just avoid the OpenBD (and/or ColdFusion) only tags!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t think Adobe will support OpenBD tags[snip]&#8221;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but imagine the following appearing everywhere&#8230;</p>
<p>cfif Server.IsColdFusion<br />
&#8230; do this<br />
cfelseif Server.IsOpenBD AND Server.Version IS NOT &#8220;9.3&#8243;<br />
&#8230; don&#8217;t do this<br />
cfelseif Server.IsCommercialBD<br />
&#8230; do this, but do it the BD way<br />
cfelse<br />
&#8230; Throw hands in air!<br />
/cfif</p>
<p>Or just avoid the OpenBD (and/or ColdFusion) only tags!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris hough</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/#comment-5326</link>
		<dc:creator>chris hough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/?p=420#comment-5326</guid>
		<description>Instead of rebuilding all of the eclipse functionality + add ons, a plug in similar flex would definitely be cheaper.  While I am more in favor of the plug in approach to keep everything I need housed in one tool, I understand your OpenBD concern.  BD could build a plug in as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of rebuilding all of the eclipse functionality + add ons, a plug in similar flex would definitely be cheaper.  While I am more in favor of the plug in approach to keep everything I need housed in one tool, I understand your OpenBD concern.  BD could build a plug in as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/#comment-5325</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/?p=420#comment-5325</guid>
		<description>Chris - thanks for spreading the word!  I'd hope if Adobe did anything they would use Eclipse. It seems like it is becoming the standard platform for IDEs (and I think that's a good thing).

With the upcoming release of OpenBD on the horizon however - the need for a vendor independent IDE may become more important - I don't think Adobe will support OpenBD tags in their IDE :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris - thanks for spreading the word!  I&#8217;d hope if Adobe did anything they would use Eclipse. It seems like it is becoming the standard platform for IDEs (and I think that&#8217;s a good thing).</p>
<p>With the upcoming release of OpenBD on the horizon however - the need for a vendor independent IDE may become more important - I don&#8217;t think Adobe will support OpenBD tags in their IDE <img src='http://www.thecrumb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris hough</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/#comment-5324</link>
		<dc:creator>chris hough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/?p=420#comment-5324</guid>
		<description>I have passed that link around to my contacts as well Jim.  There has got to be more than 300 devs around , or adobe addicts.  Even though I primarily use eclipse + dwmx cs3 it would be very interesting if adobe created a cfm ide.  I am wondering if they would take an approach similar to the current flex builder plug in or stand alone.  

..........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have passed that link around to my contacts as well Jim.  There has got to be more than 300 devs around , or adobe addicts.  Even though I primarily use eclipse + dwmx cs3 it would be very interesting if adobe created a cfm ide.  I am wondering if they would take an approach similar to the current flex builder plug in or stand alone.  </p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
