<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CFML IDE &#8211; Initial Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/</link>
	<description>ColdFusion, Ant, jQuery and other geeky stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken McCafferty</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-5522</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/?p=420#comment-5522</guid>
		<description>I still use JRun Studio 3 because of it&#039;s support for Wizards. Wizards were one of the great features of JRun Studio and CF Studio.
They can greatly decrease development time. I think if Adobe is interested in creating a great IDE for CF, they need to include the ability to create and use Wizards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still use JRun Studio 3 because of it&#8217;s support for Wizards. Wizards were one of the great features of JRun Studio and CF Studio.<br />
They can greatly decrease development time. I think if Adobe is interested in creating a great IDE for CF, they need to include the ability to create and use Wizards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SitePoint Blogs &#187; The Week in ColdFusion: 9-15 April: Code crazy</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-5361</link>
		<dc:creator>SitePoint Blogs &#187; The Week in ColdFusion: 9-15 April: Code crazy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/?p=420#comment-5361</guid>
		<description>[...] of the things that makes ColdFusion great is the community. Jim Priest has posted a community-driven CFML IDE survey&#8230; where he&#8217;s making the results publicly available. Already there are over 300 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the things that makes ColdFusion great is the community. Jim Priest has posted a community-driven CFML IDE survey&#8230; where he&#8217;s making the results publicly available. Already there are over 300 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-5327</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/?p=420#comment-5327</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don’t think Adobe will support OpenBD tags[snip]&quot;

I can&#039;t help but imagine the following appearing everywhere...

cfif Server.IsColdFusion
... do this
cfelseif Server.IsOpenBD AND Server.Version IS NOT &quot;9.3&quot;
... don&#039;t do this
cfelseif Server.IsCommercialBD
... do this, but do it the BD way
cfelse
... Throw hands in air!
/cfif

Or just avoid the OpenBD (and/or ColdFusion) only tags!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t think Adobe will support OpenBD tags[snip]&#8221;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but imagine the following appearing everywhere&#8230;</p>
<p>cfif Server.IsColdFusion<br />
&#8230; do this<br />
cfelseif Server.IsOpenBD AND Server.Version IS NOT &#8220;9.3&#8243;<br />
&#8230; don&#8217;t do this<br />
cfelseif Server.IsCommercialBD<br />
&#8230; do this, but do it the BD way<br />
cfelse<br />
&#8230; Throw hands in air!<br />
/cfif</p>
<p>Or just avoid the OpenBD (and/or ColdFusion) only tags!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris hough</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-5326</link>
		<dc:creator>chris hough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/?p=420#comment-5326</guid>
		<description>Instead of rebuilding all of the eclipse functionality + add ons, a plug in similar flex would definitely be cheaper.  While I am more in favor of the plug in approach to keep everything I need housed in one tool, I understand your OpenBD concern.  BD could build a plug in as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of rebuilding all of the eclipse functionality + add ons, a plug in similar flex would definitely be cheaper.  While I am more in favor of the plug in approach to keep everything I need housed in one tool, I understand your OpenBD concern.  BD could build a plug in as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-5325</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/?p=420#comment-5325</guid>
		<description>Chris - thanks for spreading the word!  I&#039;d hope if Adobe did anything they would use Eclipse. It seems like it is becoming the standard platform for IDEs (and I think that&#039;s a good thing).

With the upcoming release of OpenBD on the horizon however - the need for a vendor independent IDE may become more important - I don&#039;t think Adobe will support OpenBD tags in their IDE :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; thanks for spreading the word!  I&#8217;d hope if Adobe did anything they would use Eclipse. It seems like it is becoming the standard platform for IDEs (and I think that&#8217;s a good thing).</p>
<p>With the upcoming release of OpenBD on the horizon however &#8211; the need for a vendor independent IDE may become more important &#8211; I don&#8217;t think Adobe will support OpenBD tags in their IDE :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris hough</title>
		<link>http://www.thecrumb.com/2008/04/14/cfml-ide-initial-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-5324</link>
		<dc:creator>chris hough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecrumb.com/?p=420#comment-5324</guid>
		<description>I have passed that link around to my contacts as well Jim.  There has got to be more than 300 devs around , or adobe addicts.  Even though I primarily use eclipse + dwmx cs3 it would be very interesting if adobe created a cfm ide.  I am wondering if they would take an approach similar to the current flex builder plug in or stand alone.  

..........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have passed that link around to my contacts as well Jim.  There has got to be more than 300 devs around , or adobe addicts.  Even though I primarily use eclipse + dwmx cs3 it would be very interesting if adobe created a cfm ide.  I am wondering if they would take an approach similar to the current flex builder plug in or stand alone.  </p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
